How do authors go about choosing a journal to submit to? Fit of the journal is certainly a prime concern (Salinas & Munch, 2015 Tenopir et al., 2011), but much more goes into the ultimate decision. Is the risk worth the potential reward if, for example, your manuscript is rejected after a year-long review process, forcing you to resubmit elsewhere? One of the risks is the long delay from submission to publication in many journals, which might negatively impact a yearly academic review. trying to get something published in Science or Nature) others are low risk, low yield. Some of the submission options are high risk, high yield (e.g. In an author's context, returns are scientific impact, citations, and prestige that then translate to appointments, grants, tenure, and positions at better universities. You have a choice of alternative stocks from which to choose, and once you have chosen a particular option, you have to stick with it in order to see what sort of returns you get from it. Imagine that each year you manage to save part of your salary and want to regularly invest that money for future needs years from now. Authors balance risk and reward when selecting journals, leading to complex selection criteria.įrom an author's perspective, the decision to submit a paper to a particular journal could be likened to a long-term investment decision.Many services provide useful journal-matching services, but the range of available author selection priorities is varied.Journal identification services usefully aggregate information that can help authors make data-driven journal selection decisions.A growing number of free and fee-based sources exist to help authors find data on journals and publishers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |